This research explores the feasibility of replacing traditional CRUD-based business logic in three-tier applications with an AI agent. Inspired by Microsoft’s prediction that business logic in SaaS applications will transition to AI agents, this study implements a conceptual AI agent using Gemini AI as the core generative engine. The objective is to translate the vision statement into a concrete implementation pattern, experimenting with AI’s role in dynamically managing application logic. Additionally, this research aims to identify key observations on what can be accomplished with this approach and highlight critical areas of consideration, including potential challenges, limitations, and opportunities for further refinement. While more advanced AI agents exist, this work serves as an exploration of an alternative approach, contributing to the broader AI-driven application architectures.
The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping traditional software architectures, particularly in the realm of business logic execution. Historically, three-tier applications have relied on CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations embedded within a structured business logic layer. However, with the rise of AI-driven systems, there is a growing interest in exploring how AI agents can dynamically manage this logic, potentially leading to more adaptive and intelligent applications.
This research aims to investigate the feasibility of replacing conventional CRUD-based business logic with an AI agent, leveraging Gemini AI as the core generative engine. Inspired by Microsoft’s vision statement of AI-driven business logic transformation in SaaS applications, this study attempts to bring that idea to life through a practical implementation.
Through this experiment, the objective is not only to create an AI-powered alternative to traditional business logic but also to derive key observations on what such an approach can achieve.
To explore this concept, a simple Expense Tracker application was designed using a RESTful architecture, where the business logic layer was implemented using Python FastAPI. The backend supported basic GET and POST operations, allowing for the creation and retrieval of expense records stored in a MongoDB database. For database management and visualization, MongoDB Compass was used to inspect and verify stored data.
To facilitate testing and simulate user interactions, Postman was used as a tool to send REST requests and review responses. Since this study focuses on backend business logic, no formal frontend was developed. Instead, Postman effectively acted as a front-end substitute by generating requests that would typically be made by a user interface.
An architecture diagram (Figure1) illustrating the system design and flow of interactions between components is included in this study. The architecture highlights the role of AI in business logic processing and its integration with the application’s existing components.
Figure1: High-level architecture diagram
The implementation of the Expense Tracker application yielded several key results:
Simplified Business Logic – By leveraging an AI agent to manage aspects of the business logic, the complexity of manually coding traditional rules and conditions was reduced. The AI dynamically handled logic execution, demonstrating the potential for minimizing hardcoded business rules in CRUD-based applications.
Basic CRUD Operations – The system successfully performed fundamental Create and Read operations via REST API calls. MongoDB effectively handled data persistence, and Postman was used to validate the proper functioning of GET and POST requests. The AI's role in this process was exploratory, providing insights into how it could be further extended for more advanced database interactions.
Performed Computations – Beyond basic data retrieval and storage, the AI was able to execute computations on request. This demonstrated the potential for AI agents to go beyond static data handling, processing and interpreting data dynamically based on the given input.
Overall, the results indicate that AI-agent-driven business logic can serve as a viable alternative to traditional CRUD implementations, particularly for reducing complexity and enhancing flexibility.
While this research demonstrated the feasibility of using an AI-driven approach for business logic in CRUD-based applications, several key considerations and areas for further research emerged:
AI Agent Patterns – A critical area of exploration is identifying well-defined AI agent design patterns that can be effectively applied to business logic automation. Researching established methodologies for AI agent-based systems can provide guidance on best practices for structuring and optimizing AI-driven workflows.
Concurrency and Context Isolation – In multi-tenant systems, ensuring proper concurrency control and tenant-specific data isolation remains a challenge. Further research is needed to explore strategies for managing multiple simultaneous AI interactions, maintaining data integrity, and securely partitioning tenant data while allowing AI agents to process logic efficiently.
Version Control for Prompt – Since generative AI models rely heavily on prompts to generate responses and execute logic, maintaining version control for prompts is crucial. Investigating existing prompt versioning strategies, such as structured prompt libraries or automated version tracking, could help ensure consistency and improve the maintainability of AI-driven business logic.
Testing Strategies (Functional and Non-Functional) – Traditional software testing approaches may not fully apply to AI-based business logic. Research into robust functional and non-functional testing methodologies is necessary to validate prompt effectiveness, ensure consistency across AI-generated responses, and measure the reliability of AI-driven decision-making in real-world scenarios.
User Experience & UI – The integration of AI-driven business logic raises important UX considerations. Different interaction models, such as chat-based interfaces, voice-driven interactions, or traditional UI components, need to be evaluated for effectiveness. Additionally, incorporating active chatbot-like typing animations within traditional web interfaces could enhance user engagement while maintaining familiarity with existing UI paradigms.
This research demonstrated the feasibility of implementing an AI-driven business logic layer using Gemini as the generative AI engine. Through the development of a simple Expense Tracker application, the study successfully showcased how an AI agent can handle business logic, replacing traditional CRUD-based implementations. The key findings include the simplification of business logic, the successful execution of basic CRUD operations, and the AI’s ability to perform computations dynamically.
While these results highlight the potential of AI agents in application development, further research is required to address scalability, reliability, and usability challenges. Future work should explore well-defined AI agent patterns, concurrency control mechanisms, prompt versioning strategies, and comprehensive testing methodologies. Additionally, optimizing user experience across different interaction models—such as chat, voice, and traditional UI—will be crucial for wider adoption.
Overall, this study contributes to the growing discussions and research on AI-driven application architectures, offering a foundational step toward realizing more adaptive, intelligent, and scalable business logic automation. With continued advancements, AI-powered business logic has the potential to reshape enterprise application development, making it more dynamic and efficient.
There are no datasets linked
There are no datasets linked
